CVE-2025-12781

Publication date 21 January 2026

Last updated 26 February 2026


Ubuntu priority

Description

When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (without "+/"). If your application does not use the "altchars" parameter or the urlsafe_b64decode() function, then your application does not use an alternative base64 alphabet. The attached patches DOES NOT make the base64-decode behavior raise an error, as this would be a change in behavior and break existing programs. Instead, the patch deprecates the behavior which will be replaced with the newly recommended behavior in a future version of Python. Users are recommended to mitigate by verifying user-controlled inputs match the base64 alphabet they are expecting or verify that their application would not be affected if the b64decode() functions accepted "+" or "/" outside of altchars.

Read the notes from the security team

Status

Package Ubuntu Release Status
pypy3 25.10 questing Ignored see notes
24.04 LTS noble Ignored see notes
22.04 LTS jammy Ignored see notes
20.04 LTS focal Ignored see notes
python2.7 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Ignored see notes
20.04 LTS focal Ignored see notes
18.04 LTS bionic Ignored see notes
16.04 LTS xenial Ignored see notes
14.04 LTS trusty Ignored see notes
python3.4 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
14.04 LTS trusty Ignored see notes
python3.5 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
16.04 LTS xenial Ignored see notes
14.04 LTS trusty Ignored see notes
python3.6 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
18.04 LTS bionic Ignored see notes
python3.7 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
18.04 LTS bionic Ignored see notes
python3.8 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
20.04 LTS focal Ignored see notes
18.04 LTS bionic Ignored see notes
python3.9 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
20.04 LTS focal Ignored see notes
python3.10 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Ignored see notes
python3.11 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Ignored see notes
python3.12 25.10 questing Not in release
24.04 LTS noble Ignored see notes
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
python3.13 25.10 questing Ignored see notes
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release
python3.14 25.10 questing Ignored see notes
24.04 LTS noble Not in release
22.04 LTS jammy Not in release

Notes


mdeslaur

The fix provided by Python developers only adds a warning when the problematic characters are being used. They have stated in the bug that this is not an appropriate change for stable Python versions because it changes behaviour and may break existing applications. For this reason, it is not appropriate to fix this in stable Ubuntu releases. Marking this CVE as ignored.

Patch details

For informational purposes only. We recommend not to cherry-pick updates. How can I get the fixes?

Package Patch details
python3.13
python3.14